|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login  | |
|
sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/2/2008 2:12:39 AM
|
|
|
OneOfHisJewels
Posts: 1436
Joined: 8/9/2007
From: California
Status: online
|
What do you think of the morality and ethics of purposefully not having children biologically, and yet still trying to adopt? And even of having a sterilization before kids? You see, I am not married, and I am 36, and I would like to marry. I would also like to be a mother. However, due to my age, and due to medical issues I have had, some related to the reproductive system, and some not, I am just more and more getting to the point where I really don't want biological children, because I don't want to take the risk of having a child with severe health problems and/or disabilities/deformities. I think I would prefer adopting one or two kids, if I do marry (I've even thought about adopting 1 kid if I stay single, but that is another thread), and be able to go through an adoption agency and request a healthy child. Before anyone jumps on me for that, keep in mind, I do have a severely disabled sister, and while I love her dearly, I just don't want to go through that again. Yes I know, even a healthy child could get in an accident, but let's not get TOO speculative. Some people say this is ok, and some people say all married couples should try for at least one or two of their own, but I'm getting to the point where I don't necessarily agree with that. Thoughts?
_____________________________
And the Lord will continually guide you, and satisfy your desire in scorched places, and give strength to your bones; And you will be like a watered garden, And like a spring of water whose waters do not fail. Isaiah 58:11
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/2/2008 5:59:26 AM
|
|
|
Random
Posts: 1157
Joined: 4/18/2005
From: Zipperhead
Status: offline
|
I think it is admirable to be willing to raise a child that is not your own, so there is nothing wrong with adopting even if you are able to have a child biologically.
What is a QF?
_____________________________
Desmond Hume has come unstuck in time.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/2/2008 11:09:12 AM
|
|
|
stellaluna
Posts: 3251
Joined: 4/11/2005
Status: offline
|
I'm in exactly the same boat as you. We haven't gone so far as to consider sterilization, but I would not blame anyone for doing so and then adopting.
_____________________________
CW Underground
"I don't agree with Stellaluna..." -- miasma
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/2/2008 11:14:47 AM
|
|
|
Tinkerbell_
Posts: 4699
Joined: 1/25/2008
From: NeverNeverLand
Status: offline
|
I don't want anymore biological children, but I wouldn't be opposed to adopting some older children. Even though I'm fairly young, I enjoy the fact that my children will graduate from high school before I'm 40. I don't like the idea of starting over when my children are approaching their teens, even though I know many people who do.
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/2/2008 11:22:08 AM
|
|
|
OneOfHisJewels
Posts: 1436
Joined: 8/9/2007
From: California
Status: online
|
That's cool, Tink, although, I personally would still prefer to adopt a baby...doesn't have to be only hours old, or anything, but at least 2 or below. For you, that makes sense, cause you already had two kids that started out as babies. For me, even though I don't want to take the pregnancy risks, I would still like to start off with my kids as babies.
_____________________________
And the Lord will continually guide you, and satisfy your desire in scorched places, and give strength to your bones; And you will be like a watered garden, And like a spring of water whose waters do not fail. Isaiah 58:11
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/2/2008 11:33:18 AM
|
|
|
OneOfHisJewels
Posts: 1436
Joined: 8/9/2007
From: California
Status: online
|
quote:
Forgive my ignorance here - I'm a banker not a climatologist.
Isn't the issue as much the rate of change in CO2 levels as it is the gross level of CO2?
HUH??????????????????????? I do not see what that has to do with the topic AT ALL.
_____________________________
And the Lord will continually guide you, and satisfy your desire in scorched places, and give strength to your bones; And you will be like a watered garden, And like a spring of water whose waters do not fail. Isaiah 58:11
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/2/2008 11:51:00 AM
|
|
|
GroupW
Posts: 1433
Joined: 11/16/2007
Status: offline
|
Whoa! Forums blur BIG TIME.
Carry on folks!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/2/2008 2:17:32 PM
|
|
|
LCannon
Posts: 1307
Joined: 2/22/2007
From: Lebanon, OR
Status: online
|
Actually Jewels you don't have to 'ask permission' from others for not procreating or anything else other than obedience. People will think what they will; we can't live our lives according to their exceptions just be sure you're firm in yours. Courage...
< Message edited by LCannon -- 5/2/2008 4:18:47 PM >
_____________________________
"[Prayer power] hasn't never been taxed to[His]full capacity. His standing challenge, 'Call on
Me and I will answer with great and mighty things which thou can't imagine." Hudson Tayor
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/2/2008 2:31:02 PM
|
|
|
bluestone
Posts: 1450
Joined: 2/25/2008
From: Saturn
Status: offline
|
NOthing wrong with it, and I have always felt that Christians that can afford to adopt should consider it.
A child raised in a home is better off than a child raised in the government system any day.
_____________________________
Iron sharpens iron, while mush just sinks into the pot.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/2/2008 2:59:48 PM
|
|
|
OneOfHisJewels
Posts: 1436
Joined: 8/9/2007
From: California
Status: online
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: hotsaucygma
OOHJ, I do not see any reason not to adopt rather than have biological children, I also don't see a reason not to adopt as a single parent. If you are thinking in that direction though, you might want to check with local adoption agencies, sometimes there are age limitations to be an adoptive parent. At 36 you are hardly old,  , but if there are long waiting lists to adopt a healthy child you may run into a problem if you wait to start the proceedings.
Actually, I've seen ads for agencies that have no age limit. I'm not going to go on a waiting list right now, because I'm not in a position to adopt right now.
_____________________________
And the Lord will continually guide you, and satisfy your desire in scorched places, and give strength to your bones; And you will be like a watered garden, And like a spring of water whose waters do not fail. Isaiah 58:11
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/2/2008 3:17:01 PM
|
|
|
hotsaucygma
Posts: 2408
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: OneOfHisJewels
Actually, I've seen ads for agencies that have no age limit. I'm not going to go on a waiting list right now, because I'm not in a position to adopt right now.
That's good. I just know in my area there can be quite a wait for infant adoptions. I hope all goes well for you when you are ready!
_____________________________
Dear Lord, let my words today be as sweet and delicious as cheesecake... for tomorrow I may have to eat them!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/2/2008 4:18:09 PM
|
|
|
Qtman
Posts: 10952
Joined: 3/21/2006
From: Crimson Tide Country
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: OneOfHisJewels
That's cool, Tink, although, I personally would still prefer to adopt a baby...doesn't have to be only hours old, or anything, but at least 2 or below. For you, that makes sense, cause you already had two kids that started out as babies. For me, even though I don't want to take the pregnancy risks, I would still like to start off with my kids as babies.
If that is what you want to do then go for it. It is something between you your future husband if any and God. It is none of anyone else''s business. I admire you wanting to give a home to a child that has already been born.
_____________________________
Please Remember our Military Past and Present. ALL gave some, SOME gave all.
Qtman's Musings
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/3/2008 10:03:55 PM
|
|
|
SonInMe1
Posts: 3657
Joined: 4/16/2005
From: my mom by God
Status: offline
|
I could envision seeing sterilization as a sin. Someone becoming sterile so the risk of pregnancy wouldn't interfere with their "fun".
I can't see someone protecting themselves from possible physical risk being sinful.
_____________________________
You adulterous people, don't you know that friendship with the world is hatred toward God? Anyone who chooses to be a friend of the world becomes an enemy of God.
James 4:4
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sterilization question..this is NOT for the QF's - 5/8/2008 3:48:10 PM
|
|
|
Focusing
Posts: 5211
Status: offline
|
OOHJ ... good question.
I have always said that if someone doesn't want to have children, then they should not have children. Some people are not able to, or don't desire to for whatever reasons, and wanting to adopt instead is a fine choice.
Since you have health issues to keep in mind, pray about the sterilization. If that's the route you go, I think that's fine, but it should be something discussed with your husband should you marry.
quote:
A child raised in a home is better off than a child raised in the government system any day.
Amen!
_____________________________
Sam
"You're my nightcap"
|
|
|
|
 New Messages |
 No New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/ New Messages |
 Hot Topic w/o New Messages |
 Locked w/ New Messages |
 Locked w/o New Messages |
|
 Post New Thread
Reply to Message
Post New Poll
Submit Vote
Delete My Own Post
Delete My Own Thread
Rate Posts |
|
|
Forum Tools
Printable Version
