RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Life] >> Parenting



Message


Momof2anddog -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 9:47:56 AM)

NannyKat - thanks for posting those. I actually posted the "sufferthelittlechildren" site a couple of years ago here. I am convinced that the "rod" does not literally mean an implement in which to hit, rather to lead, as a shepherd.




NannyKat -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 9:54:21 AM)

Abiyah, I appreciate your response. I realize most people here will be uncomfortable in reading the articles on the links that I shared. But like I said, I am not going to push this on anyone. It really is up to the parents on what choices they make in raising children. I am sharing these links to show what I personally believe about child discipline, in case anyone is interested in reading them themselves. (Not sure if I made this clear in my previous post.)

Personally, as a nanny, I am not allowed to spank. But nor would I choose to do so if I were given that option. My employers and I have also read Dobson's books, along with a number of other Christian parenting resources. While we like a lot of what he says about family life, we respectfully disagree with his stance on corporal punishment. Instead we find other ways of teaching appropriate behavior. I know research is time consuming, but I think definitetly worth it in the long run.




NannyKat -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 9:57:04 AM)

Momof2anddog, thanks for posting! Glad to meet you, and nice to know someone who feels likewise!




Sunnymom -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 11:03:23 AM)

Nanny,

I appreciate you posting those links. I have read them before, and they have some great insights. The problem is that they only go as far as they wish to go in order to support their own beliefs. They have to spiritualize too many passages that were meant to be taken literally, and they give results of studies done on children that were spanked, but don't give the details of those studies. Most of the repercusions fo spanking that are given on the one website are all about children who were beaten and abused, not children who were spanked.

What some wish to ignore is that there is a proper way to spank that is not yanking the kid up by their arm, nearly dislocating their shoulder, and giving them whacks across their behind and back with the hand or a switch.

There are many ways that a parent can teach and train children, and spanking is just one of many things that parents can use. It is not the only means of discipline, as evidenced by the many and varied ways that God deals with us. But make no mistake- God did and does use physical punishment as a means of chastisement. Not to teach this to our children is to not fully do our duty in their spiritual training.

What bothers me is that parents who try to properly train their children using spanking are said to hit and abuse their children, but parents who let their kids sit for hours in front of a tv watching filth or playing an XBox, drinking soda and eating junk food are not considered abusive. Every time I see a really fat kid, I wonder what that parent thinks they are doing.

Why do people their knickers in a twist about spanking, when there are truly harmful ways that parents abuse their children?




Covaan_Meshuga -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 11:16:32 AM)

quote:

Of course I don't look busy...I did it right the first time!
Cute! May I borrow that? [:D]




Sunnymom -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 11:57:31 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Covaan_Meshuga

quote:

Of course I don't look busy...I did it right the first time!
Cute! May I borrow that? [:D]



Sure- I love to share!




bzirk -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 12:44:32 PM)

I guess after reading the posts (includings links) in this thread and others in the past and really thinking about my approach, I don't arbtirarily think spank or don't spank. I don't think it's that simple. Oh, I don't rule out spanking, because I might need it. But bottomline for me is that I don't think there are any formulas, because people are not all alike. Or maybe I'm just one of those parents who doesn't have their act together.

Frankly, I thank the good Lord for my wonderful children. No, I'm not saying I haven't had to do things, but I have never felt presumptuous or audacious enough about parenting to say that I know all the answers or even a goodly number. I honestly don't, my friends. I am on my knees often asking for the Lord's wisdom concerning my children.

Meanwhile, my kids are not what anyone would think of as bad kids. They are pretty good kids. They are thoughtful and kind kids. They constantly surprise us with their thoughtfulness and kindness and ability to read situations. Sometimes they aren't as diligent as an adult, but I figure that's because they're kids. LOL! However, I do expect them to reach the diligence of an adult.




W.O.F. -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 12:50:11 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: bzirk

I guess after reading the posts (includings links) in this thread and others in the past and really thinking about my approach, I don't arbtirarily think spank or don't spank. I don't think it's that simple. Oh, I don't rule out spanking, because I might need it. But bottomline for me is that I don't think there are any formulas, because people are not all alike. Or maybe I'm just one of those parents who doesn't have their act together.

Frankly, I thank the good Lord for my wonderful children. No, I'm not saying I haven't had to do things, but I have never felt presumptuous or audacious enough about parenting to say that I know all the answers or even a goodly number. I honestly don't, my friends. I am on my knees often asking for the Lord's wisdom concerning my children.

Meanwhile, my kids are not what anyone would think of as bad kids. They are pretty good kids. They are thoughtful and kind kids. They constantly surprise us with their thoughtfulness and kindness and ability to read situations. Sometimes they aren't as diligent as an adult, but I figure that's because they're kids. LOL! However, I do expect them to reach the diligence of an adult.

EXACTLY!!!!!!




FoxInSox -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 2:24:55 PM)

lisa, you are so wise :)




NannyKat -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 6:33:40 PM)

Sunnymom,

Thank you for your response.

I want to know if anyone can show me where it says in Scripture about how to "properly" spank a child. You know, exact location, how many times, what age, etc. To me this seems arbritary, as someone else mentioned that every child is different. It seems to me that if the Bible meant that there is a proper way to spank, it would have given specific instructions on how to do so. But it doesn't.

In addition, I don't know if anyone noticed or not, but the author at one of the sites has her Master's degree in Theology from Fuller Theological Seminary. Her articles are not based on her own opinion but from the original Greek and Hebrew. Moreover, the links that I gave out are not the only ones that believe that children should be handled gently. There are other Christian authors that do not support spanking children, but believe that there are ways to set firm boundaries without being permissive. They have also upheld the view that traditional understandings of the rod has long been misinterpreted, and they explain why.

Well, at any rate, I will close for now, but may add more later. Thank you for hearing me out. God bless you. :-)




bzirk -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 6:47:43 PM)

Nannykat,

And I could cite Hebrew scholars who could refute that theologian. But that aside, I'm not refuting your theologian. I'm just making this point: just like you can pick your study, you can pick your theologian to support whatever you want.

BTW, Fuller has become a little too liberal for me anyway. So Fuller as a recommendation in and of itself does not turn my head at all.

God Bless you as well, and I hope that you take my comments as they are intended --not to be harsh but to be extremely candid about what I'm thinking.




NannyKat -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 6:48:44 PM)

Oh, btw. let me add one other Christian parenting author by the name of Clay Clarkson, author of Heartfelt Discipline. He used to paddle his children but did some research on the meaning of the word Rod, and decided that he needed to reevaluate his parenting philosophy. He no longer spanks his children but uses gentle yet firm boundaries of raising his children. He and his wife have written several books together as well.




bzirk -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 6:58:00 PM)

If I hinged all of my potential to spank on that one verse, then I might refrain from spanking. But I don't. To me it's silliness to limit how we are to parent to a handful of things we read in the scriptures. God, the ultimate parent, has done all kinds of things -- including allowing a guy to be swalloed and held in the belly of a whale for three days. Now do I want that to happen in order to get my kids to do my will? Of course not, but hey, I don't rule out anything short of doing something that is clearly a sin.




NannyKat -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 6:59:44 PM)

Lisa, same here. I know this is a tricky subject and I do not want to create enemies within this site. But just being honest in what I believe. I don't wish for any of my posts to come across as an attack on anyone here.

That said, I did want to add another link that people might find interesting. www.nospank.net/swan.htm

It is about how the United Methodist Church has made a formal statement against spanking as well.




NannyKat -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 7:21:57 PM)

OK.. in regards to Jonah in the whale, (which actually, no-one knows if it was really a whale, but a big fish, as explained by a former Baptist religion professor) at the time that happened, Jonah was an adult. He was old enough to make rational logical decisions, that young children are unable to make themselves, which is why they need parents to guide them! Clearly, a young child has very little sense of logic, thus limiting his or her ability to make adult choices. A 3yo thinks nothing of sitting in the sandbox making chocolate pizza with blue macaroni. To her, it makes perfect sense. Likewise, a toddler also thinks nothing of stuffing her daddy's socks down the commode to "do the laundry!" But how is she to know that it will cost $100 bucks to call the plumber? She just thinks it's neat to watch the wet stuff go round and round and get stuck!

Logic and rationalization is something that is gradually developed over time, and I don't think we can or should expect our children to have adult values. I think we need to set them up for success (ie child proof the potty, for example!)until they are developmentally ready to handle adult ideas and decisions. We have to be careful in how we define the term "sin".




bzirk -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 7:58:07 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NannyKat

OK.. in regards to Jonah in the whale, (which actually, no-one knows if it was really a whale, but a big fish, as explained by a former Baptist religion professor) at the time that happened, Jonah was an adult. He was old enough to make rational logical decisions, that young children are unable to make themselves, which is why they need parents to guide them! Clearly, a young child has very little sense of logic, thus limiting his or her ability to make adult choices. A 3yo thinks nothing of sitting in the sandbox making chocolate pizza with blue macaroni. To her, it makes perfect sense. Likewise, a toddler also thinks nothing of stuffing her daddy's socks down the commode to "do the laundry!" But how is she to know that it will cost $100 bucks to call the plumber? She just thinks it's neat to watch the wet stuff go round and round and get stuck!

Logic and rationalization is something that is gradually developed over time, and I don't think we can or should expect our children to have adult values. I think we need to set them up for success (ie child proof the potty, for example!)until they are developmentally ready to handle adult ideas and decisions. We have to be careful in how we define the term "sin".


You're not my enemy. I'm just speaking bluntly about what I think. Don't think I'm out to put you down or make you an enemy. Not at all.

Regarding whale vs. big fish, most people know it as a whale, so it's immaterial to me if I am precise in calling it a big fish.

As for intellectual understanding, I agree that a very small child only has a minimal understanding and this develops as they grow. But people doing things wrong (aka sinfully) is not just about intellectual knowledge or lack thereof or ability to grasp it. Mankind has been sinning for a long time, and to my knowledge the Lord has been chastising His children equally as long. The Lord has used various and sundry ways to do that. I'm in the camp that doesn't believe we should limit what the Lord may have us do as well. I'm sure there are people out there who think it's heinous if a child is denied supper for misbehaving. I think if that's made into a formula and a child is routinely and cold bloodedly starved then no question that is wrong. But guess what? Sometimes a kid missing a meal is dead on. Sometimes them getting a swat is dead on as well. I don't leave it up to me alone to determine. I really do ask for the Lord's guidance.

He has surprised me at times in what He has had me do. Sometimes I have actually let an infraction go. Yep, I really said that. Why have I done that at times? Because the Lord led me to do it, and it is amazing what is wrought when I let Him teach me how to parent instead of reading the Bible like a mere code of ethics and then applying by rote or worse reading someone else's filtered version of the Bible as a code of ethics and applying by rote.

BTW, I agree that our upbringing has a great deal to do with how we see this. Guilty. [:D] But that's not all there is to it. Not that simple.




W.O.F. -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 8:00:09 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: NannyKat

Lisa, same here. I know this is a tricky subject and I do not want to create enemies within this site. But just being honest in what I believe. I don't wish for any of my posts to come across as an attack on anyone here.

That said, I did want to add another link that people might find interesting. www.nospank.net/swan.htm

It is about how the United Methodist Church has made a formal statement against spanking as well.


Exactly...it is about what you believe...and there are those of us who are honest about what we believe.

I really don't care what the United Methodist church has made a formal statement for or against. They'd do well to spend more time dealing with proper handling of discipline within their church ranks before making formal statements on how children should or should not be punished in the process of discipline.

Interestingly enough...for every study that shows the detrimental effect of spanking...there is one that shows it to be beneficial.

There is a study out by a Princeton sociologist that shocked him and his colleagues. They went out to study spanking and its evils..and instead found out that those who spanked abused their children LESS than those who did not...verbally, emotionally, physically, etc..and had closer knit relationships.

I will post a link later...at the moment I do not have it handy and do not have the time to find it.

My point?

spanking is neither evil nor the only righteous thing to do.




bzirk -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 8:23:21 PM)

quote:

spanking is neither evil nor the only righteous thing to do.


I like that. [:D]

I've got a theory why some (notice I didn't say all but some) parents who don't spank tend to abuse their kids, and hey, maybe a much loftier head than mine has already said this.

I've seen parents who try not to spank (not all of them but an inordinate number I've seen) who get in the game of passive/aggressive.

Rabid non-spankers will say it's because these people don't have the proper tools to be a non-spanker. That may be true to some extent, but I don't believe it's always true. I've seen too many cases where a spanking ended up working like a charm, and everyone was fine and learned a great deal, and having to drag things out forever and ever and ever so a kid MIGHT be able to find the black and white amongst the gray wears everyone out. Don't get me wrong. Sometimes that's appropriate. But not always. Sometimes a good old black and white spanking is the perfect solution.

EDIT: for a typo




Momof2anddog -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 9:49:01 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sunnymom

Nanny,

I appreciate you posting those links. I have read them before, and they have some great insights. The problem is that they only go as far as they wish to go in order to support their own beliefs. They have to spiritualize too many passages that were meant to be taken literally, and they give results of studies done on children that were spanked, but don't give the details of those studies. Most of the repercusions fo spanking that are given on the one website are all about children who were beaten and abused, not children who were spanked.

What some wish to ignore is that there is a proper way to spank that is not yanking the kid up by their arm, nearly dislocating their shoulder, and giving them whacks across their behind and back with the hand or a switch.

There are many ways that a parent can teach and train children, and spanking is just one of many things that parents can use. It is not the only means of discipline, as evidenced by the many and varied ways that God deals with us. But make no mistake- God did and does use physical punishment as a means of chastisement. Not to teach this to our children is to not fully do our duty in their spiritual training.

What bothers me is that parents who try to properly train their children using spanking are said to hit and abuse their children, but parents who let their kids sit for hours in front of a tv watching filth or playing an XBox, drinking soda and eating junk food are not considered abusive. Every time I see a really fat kid, I wonder what that parent thinks they are doing.

Why do people their knickers in a twist about spanking, when there are truly harmful ways that parents abuse their children?


Sunnymom - I would like to know which Scriptures you think are to be taken literally versus those that are analogous. Seriously. I find "proper" ways to spank very creepy.

Oh, and your reference to "fat kids" was pretty offensive.




Sunnymom -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 10:16:04 PM)

When I use the term 'the proper way to spank' I am not going to cite a verse that says "Thou shalt use a rod of birch wood, 1" in diameter, and apply to the hindside of a child no younger than 1 year and no older than 12."

There are some verses that get 'spiritualized' that are meant to be taken literally- some uses of the word 'stripes' for example. There are Scriptural principles that can be applied when teaching and training children- like the right and wrong kinds of anger, and how to control it, when to lower the boom, and when to show mercy- and when to let them reap some consequences.

Corporal punishment done properly is w/o anger, it is thoughtful and purposeful, and the goal to any form of punishment is to deter from harmful action, as well as to restore fellowship with repentance. That is the 'proper way to spank'.

Sorry you think it is acceptable for children to be obese. I didn't say chubby, I didn't say pudgy- I said 'really fat'. Parents who don't make sure that kids eat properly and get enough exercise, are, in my opinion, setting their children up for an unhealthy life and most likely early death. Do you think that is wrong, or offensive to say? Why? Because I used the word 'fat'? Should I have said 'horizontally challenged'?

As parents we can use so many things to teach our kids lessons of life, and spiritual lessons as well. These lessons are pint size versions of the 'real thing'. Considering the fact that God used leprosy, famine, plagues, pestilence, war, and striking people dead without two weeks notice, I think a swat on the behind is in perfect porportion to the possible reaping that a child left to himself could experience.

Who is going to define 'abuse'? Like Lisa said, some might think sending a child to bed without dinner is just horrible. I think that not teaching a child self control, and to respond to the parent's voice immediately and w/o quesion is negligent. Wanna guess how many non-spanking parents I know that have to tell their kids the same command over and over and over? How many cars does it take to turn a kid into road pizza?

I am not anyone's enemy here. I may strongly disagree with someone's opinion, but that does not mean that I think anyone is 'a bad person'. Feel free not to spank- you have to decide what your children need, and I don't know your children, or your household dynamic. I think spanking parents deserve the same- we are using the methods that God has led us to use with our children. Spanking is just one of many things I use to teach and train my kids.




jatfla -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 10:36:22 PM)

I will acknowledge, up front, that I haven't read the entire thread....it's too long. I will only give my own experience.

As an only child, my mother was the disciplinarian (sp). It aggrevated me as a child, but instinctively I knew I was being bad. My Dad, on the other hand, rarely spanked me; only twice, but it cut me to the quick. Neither my Mother or my Dad were affectionate people. That was just the way they were...I know that now as an adult. But their *spankings, for the most part, were hurtful and created a *hardness* because I never felt that I was loved.[&o]

I determined when I had children that they would KNOW that I loved them. But spanking was a part of their upbringing. I remember Dr. Dobson saying that you use more intense discipline when there was willful disobedience; when they KNOW that they are confronting a parent and challenging their authority. I didn't have to use that option often because the rule was set up early. I carried the *fanny paddle* with me in the car! The wooden spoon was readily available when needed, if necessary. The wisest advice I ever heard...."If a *child* rules at 3 what will you be dealing with at 13?" And I realized that no one enjoyed obnoxious children; I certainly did not. When children are well-behaved, the family enjoys each other and there's harmony in your home. Whatever it takes....

I am now a primary care-giver of my 2 grandchildren. The rules are the same...though it hurts a whole lot more to discipline them. But I love them enough and take my responsibility so seriously that I WANT them to learn self-control and how to function among their peers in such a way that they will be liked and enjoyed and....end up esteeming themselves.

We have an obligation to train our children to *learn* self-control and respect for others. It is NO fun. They will *hate* us, even if under their breath, but ultimately our responsibility is to the LORD and to them not to acquiesce.




bzirk -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/6/2005 11:01:50 PM)

Now I'm sure some of the responses will be that self-control can be learned without spanking. I know that is true in some cases. I have a child who really never had a spanking. Maybe a little swat on one occasion, but then I don't really remember clearly if we thought about it or we actually did it. But that was her. I have another one of my four children who practically begged for spankings. Hardheaded would not be a sufficient enough description. There was no reasoning with this kid. She just flat didn't want to listen, because she already knew the answer -- she thought. She would laugh about such things as time outs and denying privileges and other types of discipline. It was a game to her to out wait us. If you've never had a child like this, you have no clue about dealing with them.

For a long time, my husband and I kept wondering what we were doing wrong and reading things and speaking to various people we respected (both spankers and non-spankers) and of course praying and reading God's word. We came to the conclusion that she was just that way. That was her. But it was a disservice to her for us to let her remain that obstinate. I've always thought her obstinance was really determination that was not tempered by the Lord. And our part as her parents was to participate in her tempering. These days she knows her boundaries, and there is not one cell in my body that regrets having instilled that by some spankings. She is a person who can stay focused and go after a goal and never, never, never give up. But if we had not helped her along in her focus (and I firmly believe that included spankings at times), there is no telling what she would be doing today. Going her own misguided and hardheaded way no doubt.




Covaan_Meshuga -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/7/2005 1:11:11 AM)

(Yes, my Friend Bzirk, I can write, with honesty, that children can learn self-control without spanking. But up front, Bzirk, I was lucky: I got two children whose greatest desire was to please me. That made it easy. It was not until I had my first grandchild that I learned about the very, very strong-willed child! In sincerety, I thank G-d that he is 15 now, not 2! Bless him! [;)])

From being on threads like this one in the past, the subject, whether we like it or not, is highly volatile. When we ask people to prove their discipline from the Bible, we all know we can all quote supportive scripture, the Hebrew and the Greek, and our favorite psycologists and sociologists. As someone wrote, we can all find these to support our positions. I think we must, instead, appreciate each other and our differences, rather than demanding prooftexts, because all such texts can be disproven, in order to show our positions.

We each have our ways, and our reason for those ways, of disciplining. They make a lot of sense to us. Let's just learn from each other before this thread becomes explosive and closed down.

(Bzirk, put that tongue in! It's going to freeze that way!)




Momof2anddog -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/7/2005 9:47:42 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sunnymom

When I use the term 'the proper way to spank' I am not going to cite a verse that says "Thou shalt use a rod of birch wood, 1" in diameter, and apply to the hindside of a child no younger than 1 year and no older than 12."

There are some verses that get 'spiritualized' that are meant to be taken literally- some uses of the word 'stripes' for example. There are Scriptural principles that can be applied when teaching and training children- like the right and wrong kinds of anger, and how to control it, when to lower the boom, and when to show mercy- and when to let them reap some consequences.

Corporal punishment done properly is w/o anger, it is thoughtful and purposeful, and the goal to any form of punishment is to deter from harmful action, as well as to restore fellowship with repentance. That is the 'proper way to spank'.

Sorry you think it is acceptable for children to be obese. I didn't say chubby, I didn't say pudgy- I said 'really fat'. Parents who don't make sure that kids eat properly and get enough exercise, are, in my opinion, setting their children up for an unhealthy life and most likely early death. Do you think that is wrong, or offensive to say? Why? Because I used the word 'fat'? Should I have said 'horizontally challenged'?

As parents we can use so many things to teach our kids lessons of life, and spiritual lessons as well. These lessons are pint size versions of the 'real thing'. Considering the fact that God used leprosy, famine, plagues, pestilence, war, and striking people dead without two weeks notice, I think a swat on the behind is in perfect porportion to the possible reaping that a child left to himself could experience.

Who is going to define 'abuse'? Like Lisa said, some might think sending a child to bed without dinner is just horrible. I think that not teaching a child self control, and to respond to the parent's voice immediately and w/o quesion is negligent. Wanna guess how many non-spanking parents I know that have to tell their kids the same command over and over and over? How many cars does it take to turn a kid into road pizza?

I am not anyone's enemy here. I may strongly disagree with someone's opinion, but that does not mean that I think anyone is 'a bad person'. Feel free not to spank- you have to decide what your children need, and I don't know your children, or your household dynamic. I think spanking parents deserve the same- we are using the methods that God has led us to use with our children. Spanking is just one of many things I use to teach and train my kids.


Not to get off topic too much, but there are many reasons for childhood obesity. Why are you making the judgement that an obese child is suffering from parental neglect??




smootches2uall -> RE: To Spank Or Not To Spank - One Stop Thread (8/7/2005 12:20:28 PM)

quote:

momof2anddog said:
Not to get off topic too much, but there are many reasons for childhood obesity. Why are you making the judgement that an obese child is suffering from parental neglect??


I thought when I first read Sunnymom's post 'this is going to make some people offensive.' But note what she said, what quantitated the neglect or abuse those children.

First:
quote:

parents who let their kids sit for hours in front of a tv watching filth or playing an XBox, drinking soda and eating junk food are not considered abusive.


and then
quote:

Parents who don't make sure that kids eat properly and get enough exercise, are, in my opinion, setting their children up for an unhealthy life and most likely early death.


And I agree with her. There are some kids who, genetically, are predetermined for obesity. But, those cases are not the norm in studies of childhood obesity. In fact, genetic childhood obesity is the exception. In almost every other case, it is, I firmly believe, and studies have shown, the fact that children are being fed improperly and not being challenged physically, from an EARLY age. These instances, I wholeheartedly agree, are forms of neglect and abuse.




Page: <<   < prev  4 5 [6] 7 8   next >   >>



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI