|
Rufas2000 -> RE: Live (the band, not the concept) (7/21/2008 1:46:11 AM)
|
Thanks for the thoughtful post. I know you're normal genre is metal and Live is a little different from that. quote:
It's perhaps because their musical and lyrical approach was more like U2, and when people discovered their spiritual themes, they automatically assumed they were Christians. True but people should have known better or at least fans of their work (and to be fair many of them did). Kowalczyk was very clear that he had very eclectic beliefs about spirituality, many of which conflict with the church. There is very little lyrically on "Throwing Copper" that would suggest a Christian world view (and much to suggest otherwise). "The Distance To Here" and "Birds of Pray" have a few lyrics that might suggest Kowalczyk was looking into his daddy's beliefs but Christian band is quite a stretch. So like you I wonder how they got labeled as a Christian band. At least I understand why Creed was labeled that way. It does point out that Christians need to be careful when labeling a band Christian. Even if, like us, secular music isn't an issue. Being a Christian and believing a band to be the same could lead to more acceptance of the lyrics. When I listen to Maiden (although Nicko is a Christian) or Priest I realize that their lyrics don't necessarily reflect my beliefs. Many of the might (like Maiden's "Revelations") but I don't use them for spiritual guidance. Insight yes, guidance no. quote:
Which is very strange, a non-Christian, spiritually themed band considered more "Christian" than actual Christian bands who have been accused of sounding shallow and derivative. Not sure what you're trying to say. Live was mistaken for a Christian band because of their lyrics (or the misunderstanding thereof) and the anthematic presentation of them (thus the U2 comparisons). Christian bands being accused of being shallow and derivative is a musical issue or gripe, or at least I thought so. I'm curious as to what you're trying to compare or what it means for the "shallow & derivatve" Christian bands (which are out there for sure). Also, I've read critiques of Live that say they are derivitive of U2 and a bit or REM. The consensus would not probably be shallow and derivative but more like not very deep and not particularly original. Kind of the same thing but not as bad. As a fan of metal what do you think of Live? They certainly aren't metal but parts of "Throwing Copper" reach that intensity level. Their other stuff rocks fairly hard also (but only TC truly reaches metal levels of intensity). Again, thanks for responding.
|
|
|
|