|
OneJohn410 -> RE: Faith and certainty (7/1/2008 12:40:17 AM)
|
My position on God... hmm... I'm going to skinny down your post to just the questions... quote:
ORIGINAL: atheistinpeace 1. How certain are you that your position on God is correct? I.e., how certain are you that the Bible accurately describes the actions and motives of the creator of the universe? (Big questions, and you simply want a number from -10 to 10. That's interesting.) Suggest that respondents to this post rate themselves on a scale of -10 to +10 - where -10 is 'certain there is no God', 0 is 'competely uncertain; have no position either way' and +10 is 'competely certain the Christian God exists'. The reason for my interest in faith and certainty is that it frequently troubles me. What troubles you? This sentence makes no sense. Are you saying how they relate, or how can they both exist at the same time, or what? We simply cannot be certain - literally certain - about matters of God. We can only be certain about books we write ourselves about things we observe ourselves? What things do you consider can be taken as literal certainties? I see what I'm doing here, and it's not going to be fair to this post. This is a request before much more is replied to that you rework this one. It looks like the rest of my reply is going to be embedded in a quote of your original. I don't like this, but that's how it's happening. I'll try to italicize all my response so you can see where you've confused this reader. And I apply this to both sides of the debateWhat debate are you talking about? Is this just a debate in your own mind? Again, the IT that troubles you is unclear. : I recently read an article about a businessman who erected a billboard advertising a support network for non-believers. My heart sank when I read that he was 'absolutely certain' (quote) there is no God. Of course he can't be. But the problem The problem is IT, again, an undefined topic. possibly becomes even bigger for matters of religion. The word 'faith' may be used as a synonym for religious belief, which may be claimed to be supported by evidence. But I frequently see 'faith' used in the context of religion to mean what it technically should mean - beliefs held without evidence (possibly even beliefs held because of a lack of evidence - otherwise the belief becomes no longer faith-based). Surely it becomes even more impossible (if you see what I mean) to be certain in this context.Defining words as everyone should understand them because of how you think certainly makes whatever IT you are talking about even more impossible to follow, friend. A mysterious debate has got a hold of you. Secondly, false certainty can have terrible consequences. This is probably a more contentious point, as it could be reasonably argued that certainty is not required in the circumstances I'm about to describe. Take 9/11. I firmly believe that the 19 hijackers who committed the atrocity felt certain that Allah wanted them to carry out their heinous acts. Secondly - and not to equate this with terrorism - I believe that false certainity is behind, say, the decision to not fund stem cell research. I don't believe that Bush would have vetoed the funding if he had only suspected that such research goes against the will of God. Are these your beliefs, or things you are certain of? And finally, for me, claims of certainty undermine arguments. Both Christians and Muslims claim to be certain that their God is real. What if they believe this to be true? They are acting on their religious faiths, based on their beliefs. You can call it a claim, and they can turn around and claim that the problem is in your head, right? This assertion will usually be based on the conviction that their holy book is inspired by God, and/or that they've had divine experiences that leave no doubt that their God is definitely out there. I'm sure you can see the problem here: when two conflicting groups claim certainity, I'm more likely to regard both with suspicion. That gives IT, your debate, whatever it is you are talking about a ranking of a 100% problem. That's my take. There are a whole bunch of questions I'm curious about - do Christians believe that certainty is necessary for true faith? Do they believe that God would allow a small margin for doubt in the spirit of honesty? Do they believe that certainty is justifiable? Lastly, in answer to my own poll question above, I'd put myself at -9. Thanks for reading, AiP Ok, I've established a justifiable request that you reword your OP. Let's see what questions I can answer from in there without more clarification. 1. How certain are you that your position on God is correct? I.e., how certain are you that the Bible accurately describes the actions and motives of the creator of the universe? My position on God... Atheistinpeace, I'm flat on my face before the throne, confessing my continual failure to be all I can be for my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. He lifts me up, and I'm full of praise and adoration, I strive to share that with others, I realize I fail Him again, I fall on my face with my knees to the rising sun, and the process continues. That's my position on my Creator. The role of His word in my life... I've never viewed the Bible's role in my life as being to describe God's actions and explain His motives for everything. That's not why it exists for me- it's not a how to bake a cake just like God would book. It exists for many reasons for many people, but if someone told you it is supposed to help You know the motives of God, that's not right. What it does for me is help me to realize that God IS love. do Christians believe that certainty is necessary for true faith? Maybe they do, maybe they don't. Are you going to define true faith for us, or should we use our own interpretation, even if it isn't literal enough to qualify? Do they believe that God would allow a small margin for doubt in the spirit of honesty? Do they believe that certainty is justifiable? Most believe that God is a God of love, and a God of justice, and a God of absolutes. By that I mean He's merciful, and if His mercy is not accepted, He has determined how things will be. He's the Judge of judges. It's His grace and His justice that His creation exists. I am certain God exists, and having accepted Christ as Lord and Savior, he did away with all my ratings of myself and any earthly scale I would give myself. Sure, I try to live a +10 life for God, and in His eyes He sees His resurrected Son in my place. You can't put a number on that. Please tell me more about this debate you are struggling with so I can understand your problem. OneJohn410
|
|
|
|