|
Sophie11 -> RE: Texas man gets life sentence for baby's coke death (6/19/2008 12:51:19 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Kat_D quote:
ORIGINAL: Sophie11 quote:
ORIGINAL: Kat_D quote:
ORIGINAL: Sophie11 quote:
ORIGINAL: Kat_D Good! ETA: "the baby, who had metabolized cocaine in his bloodstream and undigested cocaine in his stomach." From sucking on his fingers?...I don't think so. Geez, even the prosecutor said he didn't think the man purposefully gave any cocaine to his son. They probably just couldn't prove it, but it is likely that he did from the sentence I quoted...either that, or he had quite a bit of cocaine on his fingers and was too blitzed to realize he was feeding it to his child by allowing him to suck on his fingers. Wow, as far as I know prosecutors are not usually in the habit of saying they think someone is innocent of charges simply because they can't prove their suspicions, so I'm going to go out on a limb and say the prosecutor is probably telling the truth when he says he doesn't believe it's on purpose. [sm=aside.gif] We will have to disagree on that point, but there was more to my post than what you quoted and you missed the main point entirely... Once again... Who, and who alone, is responsible for this baby's death? And as I have already stated in a previous post, the father is entirely at fault. I did not miss your point I think you are missing mine. Never did I say that the father is innocent. I have always in every post I have put out there said he is guilty. My point is not about whether or not he is guilty, it is about whether or not a life sentence should have been given in this instance. I don't think it should have been, given what I know about the case.
|
|
|
|