|
mikeman2 -> RE: Peter Schweizer: Liberals Are More Selfish Than Conservatives (6/8/2008 10:34:58 PM)
|
I think one first needs to define what being "conservative" and "liberal" mean. In fact, it seems to mean different things to different people. For example, the fact that Bush was supported by the Christian right and gone to war in many peoples minds make him a conservative. However, how is this so? For example, if you support banning abortion you are a soical conservative, however, if you support banning home schooling in California you are a social liberal. What's up with that? Also, I don't see how going to war makes one a conservative. Then you add to the mix the fact that people vary on the political spectrum depending on the issue. For example, Bush spends like a drunken sailor which is anything but a conservative notion but then gives us tax breaks which is a conservative notion. This is in contrast to a liberal like Clinton who ended up with a budget surplus in comparison but gave us no tax breaks. I suppose you could add up all the conservative positions verses liberal positions and then which ever outweighs the other makes them either conservative or liberal. I do have an intersting question to everyone, however, was Christ a liberal or conservative? For example, I have heard him been called a social conservative but a fiscal liberal. However, he broke the social norms of his day considering he never married and challenged the religious establishment. In fact, they are the only ones he oppossed directly. He also showed mercy to the woman caught in adultery who should have been stoned under Mosaic law. For these reasons he could be referred to as a social liberal. Conversly, in terms of being fiscally liberal, it is true that he gave money to the poor and served God rather than mammon, however, there are examples which seems to indicate he was a fiscal conservative. He once rebuked Judus for rebuking Marry from annoiting his feet with a precious ointment by saying that it was OK because the poor you have with you always. He also gave parables which seem to suggest that he who does much with much that is given will gain even more and those that do nothing with next to nothing will have even less.
|
|
|
|