Mark 3:35 (Full Version)

All Forums >> [Theology] >> God



Message


Rev_22_4 -> Mark 3:35 (4/29/2008 2:41:03 AM)

I have read the book of Mark before but, I am doing a study on it and right now and, a few days ago I was reading chapter 3 and the end really caught my attention. It has never meant so much to me before as it does now. It is just so beautiful. I would like to get everyone's input as to what verse 35 means to you. I want to see this verse from all angles.

quote:


Mark 3
31 There came then his brethren and his mother, and, standing without, sent unto him, calling him.
32 And the multitude sat about him, and they said unto him, Behold, thy mother and thy brethren without seek for thee.
33 And he answered them, saying, Who is my mother, or my brethren?
34 And he looked round about on them which sat about him, and said, Behold my mother and my brethren!
35 For whosoever shall do the will of God, the same is my brother, and my sister, and mother.




fahey440 -> RE: Mark 3:35 (4/29/2008 1:47:54 PM)

To me the words highlight the fact that as Christians we are like one big happy family. Isn't it amazing to know that no matter what life throws at you, you will always have your family in Christ right by your side :)




faithfulservant_ -> RE: Mark 3:35 (4/29/2008 2:21:45 PM)

I'm glad you brought up this up. "For whoever does the will of God, he is My brother and sister and mother." What does this mean? Many people will profess to know God and even do wonders in God's name. That is why God said: "Many will say to Me on that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in Your name, and in Your name cast out demons, and in Your name perform many miracles?" But God will reject these people. So what is the will of God and who are God's people? Read this verse carefully and it will reveal to you the doctrine of God.


"They profess to know God, but by their deeds they deny Him, being detestable and disobedient and worthless for any good deed. But as for you, speak the things which are fitting for sound doctrine. Older men are to be temperate, dignified, sensible, sound in faith, in love, in perseverance. Older women likewise are to be reverent in their behavior, not malicious gossips nor enslaved to much wine, teaching what is good, so that they may encourage the young women to love their husbands, to love their children, to be sensible, pure, workers at home, kind, being subject to their own husbands, so that the word of God will not be dishonored. Likewise urge the young men to be sensible; in all things show yourself to be an example of good deeds, with purity in doctrine, dignified, sound in speech which is beyond reproach, so that the opponent will be put to shame, having nothing bad to say about us. Urge bondslaves to be subject to their own masters in everything, to be well-pleasing, not argumentative, not pilfering, but showing all good faith so that they will adorn the doctrine of God our Savior in every respect."
(Titus 2:1-10)




JordanW -> RE: Mark 3:35 (4/30/2008 2:59:40 AM)

That verse is just so touching.[:)]




SavedbyGrace2007 -> RE: Mark 3:35 (5/8/2008 2:44:57 PM)

That is a beautiful verse. It's amazing! [:)]

I'm surprised more isn't mentioned about it because it is so extraordinary: "the same is my brother, and my sister, and mother."

We know we are children of God, co-heirs with Christ, therefore He's our Brother. But! We are also His sister and His mother! <-- right here is significant. Jesus is including the broader feminine element there (not limited to His earthly mother alone). Jesus never excluded women (or children for that matter, or those discriminated against or outcasts in society; nothing and no one keeps Him away except someone's rejection of Him personally).

He was/is a Rebel who here is rejecting the traditional family structure and replacing it with one not of biological ties.

Who can claim to be these (His brother, sister, mother)? Obviously if you shall do the will of God you can! Hallelujah! It's a family thang. [:D]



God Bless. [:)]




Bluethread -> RE: Mark 3:35 (5/15/2008 6:50:10 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: SavedbyGrace2007

That is a beautiful verse. It's amazing! [:)]

He was/is a Rebel who here is rejecting the traditional family structure and replacing it with one not of biological ties.


I have a real problem with this view of Yeshua(Jesus) as a rejectionist. In what way is it beautiful to undermine the family structure as Adonai established it?

I do not see Him as rejecting the family structure but clarifying His responsibilties as firstborn. He had a responsibility to His genetic family that He affirms at His execution when He asks Yochanan(John) to care for His mother. We also have other passages where He is in contact with His genetic family and there is no hint that He neglected His responsibility as firstborn. Though we can not be sure of why his family was there, it is possible that they came to gather up their "crazy" brother as an intervention. Therefore, I would say the lesson here is that our responsibilties to our genetic families, though vitally important, do not preclude our responsibilities to our community.




bob97 -> RE: Mark 3:35 (5/16/2008 12:15:38 AM)

The Church takes preeminence over the biological family. Nothing is more important than the family of God.


Mat 10:21 And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child: and the children shall rise up against their parents, and cause them to be put to death.

Mat 10:35 For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the daughter against her mother, and the daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.


Bob




Bluethread -> RE: Mark 3:35 (5/16/2008 6:19:52 PM)

Adonai, belief in Him and His ways are the most important. Family as He has defined it is therefore, just as important. In my opinion, the idea that "the church" is more important than family is a very dangerous belief. It has been the genesis of many a cult. Yeshua(Jesus) does say that anyone who leaves family for the kindom of Adonai will recieve a greater blessing than that of family. This of course is talking of the family that is not part of the kingdom of Adonai. In Adonai's kingdom families do not split up. Contrary to the belief of some, I do not believe that the Scriptures equate "the church" with the kingdom of Adonai.




bob97 -> RE: Mark 3:35 (5/16/2008 9:17:54 PM)

Those who belong to Christ...are they not a part of Gods family? Is it not more important to accept Christ and belong to the family of God rather than allow biological family ties prevent one from accepting Christ because of family pressures or let that same biological family interfere with one’s spiritual growth?

I believe that is what Christ is telling us in Mat 10:35.

Of course biological family is important but not above Christ.

Bob




abraxas -> RE: Mark 3:35 (5/17/2008 12:53:37 PM)

If someone had asked him, What's your definition of 'mother' or 'brother', then he would have been simply broadening those terms. But someone said, Hey, your mother and your brother are outside, they want to talk to you.

So in that case, to say that the people he was talking to were his mother/brethren was a rejection of his actual mother and brothers.




Heavendweller -> RE: Mark 3:35 (5/17/2008 1:03:52 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: abraxas

If someone had asked him, What's your definition of 'mother' or 'brother', then he would have been simply broadening those terms. But someone said, Hey, your mother and your brother are outside, they want to talk to you.

So in that case, to say that the people he was talking to were his mother/brethren was a rejection of his actual mother and brothers.

Abraxas,
I would encourage you to have a broader understanding of the text. I think that Jesus is including ALL people as his mother and brothers who do the will of God. So this would include the members of his earthly family who do the will of God. I think the focal point of the passage is "those who do the will of God." It is these who are members of Christ's family.

Heavendweller




abraxas -> RE: Mark 3:35 (5/17/2008 1:14:02 PM)

quote:

Mark 3


The text doesn't rule out Christ's next comment saying, "Excuse me for a moment, I'll be right back." So it's possible that something like that followed.




Heavendweller -> RE: Mark 3:35 (5/18/2008 2:56:05 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: abraxas

quote:

Mark 3


The text doesn't rule out Christ's next comment saying, "Excuse me for a moment, I'll be right back." So it's possible that something like that followed.

Now I'm lost. Could you clarify? [;)]

Thanks.

Heavendweller




cognitivemagic -> RE: Mark 3:35 (5/27/2008 6:47:40 PM)

Heavendweller, it's good to see your posts again. I've been on tangents and haven't engaged on Calvinism for a while.....and I've been busy.

I would make this point in response to the OP:

God created us in His image and His likeness. Therefore, we have a native resemblance to God, in some way.

However, because of our falleness, while we still retain His image, we have lost His likeness.

Therefore, we can rightly say that all humans are children of God because we were created by God and stamped with His image.

But we have fallen from our high position as God's children and squandered our inheritance as God's children in Prodigal living; hence losing our estate and right in God's family.

However, God became man in order to restore man to his estate. By the taking of humanity into God by God's Only Begotten, God then sanctifies humanity and heals that broken bond. But even more, He works to renew us to His likeness so that we are not merely God's children in name, but also in nature. However, we have to freely allow God to change us. If God coerced us to change or internally altered our will to change (i.e. Augustinianism/Calvinism), we not only would not be like God, we could not be like God: because God Himself is free.

It's like this line from the movie "The Ninth Configuration" (paraphrase):

Cutshaw: Omnipotence means God creates a being that He knew would complain.

I recommend Book IV "Beyond Personality", in C.S. Lewis' "Mere Christianity", as a great statement of this truth.




BerianAardvark -> RE: Mark 3:35 (5/27/2008 7:48:30 PM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: abraxas

quote:

Mark 3


The text doesn't rule out Christ's next comment saying, "Excuse me for a moment, I'll be right back." So it's possible that something like that followed.


Actually it is doubtful that that is what He did. Text without context is pretext, so let us consider ten verses earlier (before the distraction provided by the Pharisees).

And He came home, and the crowd gathered again, to such an extent that they could not even eat a meal. When His own people heard of this, they went out to take custody of Him; for they were saying, "He has lost His senses." (Mark 3:20-21 NASB)

The home was most likely Peter's family's house since it is mentioned as being in Capernaum and that is where He based His Gallilian Ministry.

Who were His own People? His Mother and Brothers who heard about how hard Jesus was working and decided to "rescue" Him:

Then His mother and His brothers *arrived, and standing outside they sent word to Him and called Him. A crowd was sitting around Him, and they *said to Him, "Behold, Your mother and Your brothers are outside looking for You." Answering them, He *said, "Who are My mother and My brothers?" Looking about at those who were sitting around Him, He *said, "Behold My mother and My brothers! "For whoever does the will of God, he is My brother and sister and mother." (Mark 3:31-35 NASB)

They were well meaning, but utterly mistaken, and were about to take Him away for a rest "for His own good". In this case their good intentions and concern had put them completely at odds with God's Will.

So WHO did Jesus consider to be His real family??? Those who were doing God's will, in this case those around Him rather than those who were following earthly wisdom.

Tim




Bluethread -> RE: Mark 3:35 (5/29/2008 5:38:32 PM)

Now, Yeshua(Jesus) recognizing the crowd as His extended family does not mean He was violating Torah by not honoring His mother. He was, in my opinion, merely pointing out that with due respect he had work to do. Nor does it set a new precident that one is justified in abrogating ones familial responsabilities for "the church". Wasn't it Yeshua(Jesus) who found fault with the priests for saying that one need not take care of ones parents if one choses to give money to the temple instead? Now if ones family rejects them for their beliefs that is another story. But, I see nowhere in Scripture where one is told to reject ones family for the purpose of 'ministry".




BerianAardvark -> RE: Mark 3:35 (5/30/2008 12:06:15 PM)

quote:

Now, Yeshua (Jesus) recognizing the crowd as His extended family does not mean He was violating Torah by not honoring His mother. He was, in my opinion, merely pointing out that with due respect he had work to do. Nor does it set a new precident that one is justified in abrogating ones familial responsabilities for "the church". Wasn't it Yeshua(Jesus) who found fault with the priests for saying that one need not take care of ones parents if one choses to give money to the temple instead? Now if ones family rejects uthem for their beliefs that is another story. But, I see nowhere in Scripture where one is told to reject ones family for the purpose of 'ministry".


Of course not. One of the most consistent accusations against Isra'el was their lack of concern for family especially parents, orphans and widows.

" 'The leaders of Isra'el in you all use their power in order to shed blood. In you, they make light of fathers and mothers, they oppress foreigners, they wrong orphans and widows. (Ezekiel 22:6-7)

The verses you were referencing regarding Yeshua and korban are below:

Yesha answered them, "Yesha`yahu was right when he prophesied about you hypocrites -- as it is written, 'These people honor me with their lips, but their hearts are far away from me. Their worship of me is useless, because they teach man-made rules as if they were doctrines.' "You depart from God's command and hold onto human tradition. Indeed," he said to them, "you have made a fine art of departing from God's command in order to keep your tradition! For Moshe said, 'Honor your father and your mother,' and 'Anyone who curses his father or mother must be put to death.' But you say, 'If someone says to his father or mother, "I have promised as a korban" ' " (that is, as a gift to God) " ' "what I might have used to help you," ' then you no longer let him do anything for his father or mother. Thus, with your tradition which you had handed down to you, you nullify the Word of God! And you do other things like this." (Mark 7:6-13)

It is restated later in the Pauline Epistles:
Moreover, anyone who does not provide for his own people, especially for his family, has disowned the faith and is worse than an unbeliever. (1 Timothy 5:8)

The issue is not rejection of family in favor of ministry...we are to be the spiritual heads of our households...that much is also made clear through out scripture, but rather the expansion of the concept of family to include all who do His Will.

Yeshua did not reject his biological family, even though what they intended was clearly contrary to God's will, nor are we to reject or ignore our family, even though they are not believers, or even deny us because we are believers.

If we examine bob97's "proof texts" in context it is east to see that we are NOT being told it is permissible to give precedence to church over family.

"A brother will betray his brother to death, and a father his child; children will turn against their parents and have them put to death. Everyone will hate you because of me, but whoever holds out till the end will be preserved from harm. (Matthew 10:21-22)

Here He is warning that unbelieving family will hate and persecute believing members...not that believers should reject unbelieving family. We are called upon to love and pray for even those who persecute us, even family.

For I have come to set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law, so that a man's enemies will be the members of his own household. Whoever loves his father or mother more than he loves me is not worthy of me; anyone who loves his son or daughter more than he loves me is not worthy of me. (Matthew 10:35-37)

These verses come close to being a proof text...but even they don't tell believers to reject their biological family. It does say that because we are His followers we will begin making making decisions in line with our new beliefs, and the changes in morals, values and goals. The fact that our family may reject us because of those changes cannot be used an excuse to avoid making those decisions and changes, but again it is our family moving away from us, NOT us rejecting or neglecting them.

"Sh'ma, Yisra'el! Adonai Eloheinu, Adonai echad [Hear, Isra'el! Adonai our God, Adonai is one]; and you are to love Adonai your God with all your heart, all your being and all your resources. (Deuteronomy 6:4-5)

Says much the same thing...God is to be our top priority in all things...but the total context of scripture, that is to say God's own word, demands that we care for our parents and families, which means that neglecting or rejecting them is not honoring His will, not putting at His disposal all of your resources.

Far too many Christians ruin their witness by paying more attention to their ministry than their family. How can you proclaim God's love when you family is suffering from inattention?

But for those in ministry of some sort an unbelieving wife hardly likely to be an issue...which means there is even less reason to ignore their needs.

Deacons must be husbands of only one wife, and good managers of their children and their own households. (1 Timothy 3:12)

Ministries cannot be allowed to become competition to wives, nor are children and households be neglected because of ministry duties, that would not be good leadership and management of their own households.

The qualifications for elder/leader/pastor are no less clear that the care and nurture of our families is a part of our ministry, if anything they are more stringent in this respect.

A leader must be blameless, husband to one wife, with believing children who do not have a reputation for being wild or rebellious. For an overseer, as someone entrusted with God's affairs, must be blameless -- he must not be self-willed or quick-tempered, he must not drink excessively, get into fights or be greedy for dishonest gain. On the contrary, he must be hospitable, devoted to good, sober-mindedness, uprightness, holiness and self-control. He must hold firmly to the trustworthy Message that agrees with the doctrine; so that by his sound teaching he will be able to exhort and encourage, and also to refute those who speak against it. (Titus 1:6-9)

Did Jesus go out to greet his earthly mother and brothers? He didn't allow them to take Him away for a "much needed rest" in either case, nor would it have been in His nature to have been disrespectful to them. If it were truly important for us to know exactly how He accomplished this it would have been covered in scripture.

Personally I suspect He had them ushered in so that they could see that He was healthy and not insane or over worked, thus answering their concern over His health and well being without a direct confrontation.


Tim




abraxas -> RE: Mark 3:35 (6/17/2008 12:48:18 PM)

quote:

quote:

abraxas: The text doesn't rule out Christ's next comment saying, "Excuse me for a moment, I'll be right back." So it's possible that something like that followed.

Heavendweller: Now I'm lost. Could you clarify?


Hi Heavendweller, I'm sorry-- I've been offline for quite a while. What I meant was that when we consider what it means to respect/honor one's family, especially one's parents, we might expect that something like the comment I suggested would follow. Jesus's mother is outside asking for him, and he's not even going to go out long enough to say, "Thanks for your concern but I've got work to do"?




solarflare -> RE: Mark 3:35 (6/17/2008 11:21:31 PM)

quote:

He was/is a Rebel who here is rejecting the traditional family structure and replacing it with one not of biological ties.


In absolutely no way was Jesus a rebel or rejecting traditional family structure. Try interpreting the verse in the context in which in was written.

1) The Bible states that rebellion is as the sin of witchcraft I Sam.15:23
The word rebellion means 'a refusal of obedience' - Jesus ALWAYS
obeyed His Father - He stated "I and the Father are One."
Rebellion? I don't believe so."

2) God made the family unit - why would he replace it? The family is the ideal. Human beings have distorted that ideal, what with divorce, poligamy, homosexuality etc. Now THAT is rebellion.




solarflare -> RE: Mark 3:35 (6/17/2008 11:24:22 PM)

quote:

The issue is not rejection of family in favor of ministry...we are to be the spiritual heads of our households...that much is also made clear through out scripture, but rather the expansion of the concept of family to include all who do His Will.


Sounds more like it.[sm=icon_smile_idea.gif]




Page: [1]



Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI