|
iluvatar -> RE: Great books on Creation for teens?? (5/23/2008 3:44:26 AM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: stampinlady Any good titles to pick up? Ds is getting hit with Evolution this month and while he's been taught Creationism I'd like some extra reading for him. I get Acts and Facts in the mail, but haven't checked to see what they have, duh. I don't care for Ken Hams stuff. If you don't care for Ken Hamm's material, you're probably out of luck as AIG is one of the better organizations; it really only goes downhill from there. EDIT: except for ICR - they're actually trying to do some legitimate research. Most "creation science" material available is rife with gross inaccuracies - not just different interpretations of data, but incorrect data, espousing/presenting falsified (or just wrong) theories, and mischaracterizations of scientific proccesses. For example: quote:
Oh have I got a book for you! I just need to find the title. It's authored by Dr. Grady McMurtry. He used to be an evolutionist so he's a great authority on how to counteract that theory. His website is www.creationworldview.org. The book is called "Creation: Our World View". He began a revival at my church 2-3 years ago and I bought this book and some of his CD's (which are wonderful). This site is so full of errors, it's staggering. Since this isn't the Science forum (and since it's 3:30am), I'll refrain from going through them 1-by-1, but I will say a few things: The claims he makes about radiometric dating "assumptions" are grossly exaggerated, if not downright false. If you're interested in learning about radiometric dating, check out this site, written by a Christian geologist. Regarding the claims he makes about physics: *No, redshift cannot be caused by dust grains re-emitting photons in the infrared band. *No, the Big Bang Theory does not posit that the universe is expanding around a single point in the middle. *No, no evidence has not shown that the speed of light has changed. *No, no evidence has not shown that radioactive decay rates have changed. In fact, it's just the opposite - evidence shows they have stayed constant. *No, light cant "get tired" and cause a redshift. If light had slowed down, it would have blue-shifted. etc, etc, etc But he gets away with spreading this stuff, because most people in church don't know any better. -Dan.
|
|
|
|