|
abu_khomar -> RE: Why do so many people reject water baptism (4/11/2008 10:35:52 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: greatdivide46 quote:
ORIGINAL: abu_khomar I do not agree however. The text says they received the Holy Ghost, not tongues, and it does not say they received the Holy Ghost before they were baptized, but after, and it wasnt immediately after they were baptized. Yes the text says they received the Holy Ghost. But the text does not say they didn't receive the gift of tongues. In fact in Acts 19:6 it says, "they began speaking in tongues." In order for that to happen they had to have received the gift of tongues, even though it doesn't specifically say so. quote:
From what I understand you are expressing as to what you believe, you are saying that you believe the Holy Ghost is given at baptism, but here in acts 8 and acts 19, it isnt given at, it is given after, that is the point I am trying to make. I understand the point you are trying to make. I just happen to disagree. I think its entirely possible that they received the indwelling presence of the Holy Spirit when they were baptized, then received the Holy Spirit via the gift of tongues later. That's why I think when it says they received the Holy Spirit, it is specifically talking about the gift of tongues. quote:
The text does not say they were saved when they were baptized, and I dont understand how this can be, since they ddint receive the Spirit of God when they were baptized. The text does not say they didn't receive the Spirit of God when they were baptized. And it doesn't say they were saved when they were baptized because every Christian in New Testament times would have understand that one is saved when they are baptized. quote:
And the gift of the Holy Ghost is NOT commonly referred as the gift of tongues, and it is never referred to in that way in Acts, in fact, acts 8 does not mention tongues. You are right. The gift of the Holy Ghost is NOT commonly referred to as the gift of tongues. That's not what I said at all. And while you are correct that Acts 8 does not mention tongues, what do you suppose Simon saw that convinced him that they had received a gift of the Holy Spirit? Where does the word say they received anything at all at baptism? Why should we assume they did when it appears they didn't? It doesn't, but it does say what they received after they were baptized, it says they received the Holy Ghost, not a gift. It is evident they did receive a gift, but they holy ghost is an entirely different gift than a gift OF the Spirit. Why would every new christian understood they were saved when they were baptized, I do not believe this at all, it isn't taught or preached in acts. For future reference, acts 2:38 does not say that, because we also se instances of people receiving the holy ghost BEFORE they were baptized, and not always after, and also, acts 2:38 does not say they shall receive it AT baptism, if anything, it would indicate it is an event that happens after baptism at the most, just as in seen in acts 8 and acts 19. Also, nowhere is there teaching of an indwelling presence of the spirit, especially at baptism. That is something that must be inferred, and its difficult to make a doctrine of this type from inference alone.
|
|
|
|