|
lewbcw -> RE: How to Teach/Parent/Discipline Troublesome Students (5/6/2008 10:36:12 AM)
|
Hi Everyone, I wanted to get an opinion on something I discussed with another teacher last week regarding a particular group of problematic students and how to work with them. The main strategy in question here was the appropriate use of positive reinforcement, which I will discuss in more detail throughout this post. In giving me feedback on how to handle a specific class, this teacher mentioned that the class of eight students was very troublesome and that the entire sixth grade faculty knew of them. They were students who absolutely refused to do any school work, did not care whether they passed or failed, refused discipline, and had horrendous home lives/backgrounds (the stories were very heartbreaking to listen to for each child). Each of the kids sadly had irresponsible, absentee, and abusive caretakers and all of them lived in poverty with no positive resources, nor role models to draw upon; the school teachers prior to and up through their sixth grade year also had little impact on them as their records and history indicated constant discipline problems and poor academic performance. (In fairness, I have, in fact, had "worse" classes, but because these were sixth graders, perhaps the behavior and attitude of this group was a bit more extreme for their age. They were completely wild with no care for authority, nor school work on a test day.) The teacher's response and comments to me were that rather than trying traditional discipline methods (because these were ignored by the children), the faculty shifted their focus to the use of positive reinforcement methods , along with frequent expressions of love and compassion. They found that no matter what they threatened the child with in terms of disciplinary consequences, the group of kids did not care to change their behavior. When they were told they needed to serve detention after school for cursing or fighting with another student, many of the children felt that was no different, if not better (qualitatively), than going home and being beaten or sexually abused by their caretaker(s). Some students preferred to be at school rather than at home, specifically to avoid their family life. Likewise, when the teachers discussed the consequences of laziness with their students and having to work at low-paying, unfulfilling jobs in their future, the kids felt that working at McDonald's was an improvement over their mother or father's welfare checks and complete lack of employment. Simply having a job was already good in the child's mind. The children's family lives were so depressed that the teachers essentially found they could not use negative deterrents to teach them, because no matter how they punished these kids, it was not worse (and possibly better) than what they experienced at home. She mentioned that those teachers who had tried traditional discipline found that it caused a "hate-hate" relationship, where both student and teacher "could not stand each other". I believe this was out of frustration from the child at being nagged and from the teacher seeing the ineffectiveness of traditional discipline methods on these kids. (A lot of the kids had very low self-esteem, which they felt was attacked and lowered even more each time the teachers disciplined or corrected them, so this led to increased resentment and hostility towards the teacher.) In response, the teachers' strategy was to use positive reinforcement and reward these children (instead of traditional discipline/punishment), as much as possible, for every good thing they did to try to get them to "do good" and to work with them on developing basic life skills at a different pace than the other school kids. I wondered about this strategy and possibly the need to balance it with "regular" or "normal" discipline (at some point), which would still include punishment. I recognize that Scripture teaches us the need to discipline our kids to show them right and wrong and the consequences of our actions, yet I also find what the teachers are doing to be very loving and helpful to the kids as well. Is it ok to teach the kids with an alternative method? And if we use this method, how do we balance it with discipline/punishment? Part of me feels that these kids need psychological counseling and lots of love even before they can be "normal," healthy participants in society and the classroom, and so I wonder as a teacher how to work with them? Do we give them a kind of "grace period" or different standard than the other kids? That has seemed to be the strategy the sixth grade faculty have adopted at this particular school. They say that they no longer punish the kids for their inappropriate remarks and constant fighting (as the kids would literally be suspended every day and put out of school), but instead try to use mostly positive reinforcement - though I am guessing they do punish them in extreme cases of misbehavior. But essentially, they have created a different set of rules for these particular kids (they let things "slide" a bit more easily). This was not unlike the story I mentioned in my earlier post, where a teacher advised me not to write up an assault report in my class, because the Dean would not do anything about it and there were bigger problems than these regular or "common" occurences, but with this teacher, she went a step further and referred to the use of positive reinforcement as their teaching and discipline strategy. Whereas, the other teacher in the assault case, did not offer me that advice and alternative program. What are parents' and teachers' thoughts on this? I know that positive reinforcement is taught commonly as one of many strategies to use in the classroom and parenting, but using it as a primary strategy with the kids I mentioned above....is that a good approach? Thank you all again for your comments and thoughts so far. I look foward to future dialogue with everyone. Blessings, lewbcw [:)]
|
|
|
|