|
Users viewing this topic:
none
|
|
Login  | |
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/11/2008 2:42:56 PM
|
|
|
JoyfulWife
Posts: 384
Joined: 5/3/2005
From: The South
Status: offline
|
What interests you about natural childbirth?
Like everyone else who has answered so far, I find pregnancy and birth to be an absolutely amazing and intriguing process. I think it's incredible that God created a woman's body with the ability to carry life and bring it forth. The way He designed the body and the process is amazing. Unless in an emergency situation, I truly believe we were created to be able to do this naturally and on our own. It is an incredibly empowering experience, and I feel that a lot of women get conned out of it by all the unnecessary interventions that are pushed on them.
If it's very important to you, why?
Several reasons:
1. I believe that we were created to be able to birth this way on the whole, and unless in a high-risk situation, I think it's the best way to go. I don't like messing around with something if it works fine in the first place.
2. On the whole, we (my husband and I) keep a very natural lifestyle. Natural childbirth is just an extension of the way we already live our life.
3. I strongly believe in being informed and educated on issues. I don't mean this in a "school" sense of educated, but in an education of the self by reading, researching, learning from those who have gone before us or are knowledgeable on the subject. I think it is our responsibility.
4. Like Kim, I am an active participant in my health care and am definitely a minimal interventionist. That, and I don't like people telling me what to do  , j/k!!
_____________________________
Whatever my lot, Thou hast taught me to say,
It is well, it is well, with my soul.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/11/2008 2:48:07 PM
|
|
|
Royal.Fortress
Posts: 1894
Joined: 8/11/2005
From: Ontario
Status: offline
|
Well spoken, Joyful!
_____________________________
Kim
my blog -> kim thru the looking glass
36 weeks pregnant with our June Bug!!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/11/2008 3:00:36 PM
|
|
|
JoyfulWife
Posts: 384
Joined: 5/3/2005
From: The South
Status: offline
|
quote:
I WOULD have had another c-section if I had been laboring in the hospital, but in reality nothing was wrong...just a 10 pound baby sunny-side-up who took his time.
Exactly - I would have ended up with an unnecessary c-section too. There was absolutely nothing wrong during my daughter's birth. And since I wasn't constantly being checked internally, we didn't have to worry about infection. She just took a very l o o o o g time. Sometimes I wonder if it has to do with her personality - she's still like that. Mealtimes last an hour here because she is such a sloooow eater! Lol!
Here is the birth story from August of 2006. I remember posting here on Crosswalk during my labor when I was at 7 cm. I think I posted something about being almost done, but little did I know!  :
"On Tuesday the 1st of August (two days after the estimated due date), at my appointment with the midwife, I found out that Hannah was in a posterior postion. She was lying with her back facing my back - not a good position for birth. Because of this, my midwife suggested seeing a chiropractor once I was 41 weeks. The chiropractor would be able to perform the Webster technique, which is usually used to turn a breech baby, but can also work for a posterior position. The next Tuesday (the 8th) I went to the chiropractor since Hannah still had not arrived yet and we were pretty sure she was still posterior. The next afternoon, I noticed that I was having braxton-hicks contractions (they are practice contractions). I was really excited because I hadn't experienced any kind of labor signs and we were already eight days past the due date. Labor started early Thursday morning somewhere around 2:00 or 3:00 in the morning. I was able to sleep until about 5:30, and then was too distracted by the contractions to sleep any longer. I stayed in contact with my midwife throughout the day. We made another visit to the chiropractor, and spent the day relaxing. Thursday night was passed with me sleeping for eight minutes, then having a contraction, sleeping for eight minutes, having another, etc. The next morning (Friday) I called the midwife, told her what was going on, and she said she'd be over in about an hour. Once she arrived here, she checked to see how dilated I was, and we found out I was already at 7 cm. We figured labor would pick up soon, and the baby would be here after lunch. After lunch, she checked again, and I was at 10 cm at that point. The only hold up though was that a small part of the cervix was not totally effaced and her head was not coming straight on, and that was keeping the baby from being able to descend. At this point the contractions were getting much more intense - up until that point they hadn't been all that terrible. By 9:00 that night, the contractions were just terrible. I had tried laboring in the birthing pool, standing up, sitting down, laying on my side, in the tub - just about every position possible. The midwife checked again, and I was still exactly where I was after lunch - 10 cm, but the lip on the cervix was still there. At that point I was feeling exhausted, but we kept trying different positions hoping that something would work and we could begin the pushing stage soon. By midnight things were still the same, no change, and the contractions were very intense with some of them coming three or four in a row with no rest time in between. We continued laboring - Sam was the most wonderful encouragement, without him I don't think I would have been able to keep going. And the midwives did an incredible job of helping me to focus and encouraging me on. At 2 am the midwife checked once again to see if any progress had been made. The cervix was still the same, but Hannah had descended a little bit. About thirty minutes later, all of a sudden, I finally had the urge to push! The lip was still on the cervix, but Hannah was definitely coming out no matter what! Pushing was not the relief I thought it would be, but I was so glad to finally be at that point. Sam sat behind me while I pushed with me leaning against him, and we were able to see the progress made in a mirror at the foot of the bed. Towards the end of pushing though, Hannah's heartbeat began to drop, so the midwives had me stand to push so that we could get her out quicker. Sam had to support me, but pushing went a lot quicker in the stand/half squat position. Soon after that, at 5:06, Hannah was out and in our arms! Her skin pinked up very fast and she had her eyes opened wide right away! She is absolutely beautiful and Sam and I can't believe how blessed we are. We know God was working incredibly during the labor, and He answered so many prayers! It was only possible through Him!! Even though it was hard, it was definitely worth it!"
_____________________________
Whatever my lot, Thou hast taught me to say,
It is well, it is well, with my soul.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/11/2008 3:24:17 PM
|
|
|
EmilyAnn
Posts: 1103
Joined: 12/18/2005
From: Thomasville, NC
Status: offline
|
Thank you for posting that again. I can't believe it has been over a year since your little Hannah was born. Reading birth stories always makes me cry, but I love it. Birth is such a beautiful and wonderful thing. What an amazing gift God has given us!
_____________________________
My Blog (updated 4/29/08 34 week belly pics)
36 weeks pregnant. It's a boy!! David William is due June 9, 2008!!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/11/2008 4:39:54 PM
|
|
|
clag4christ
Posts: 2702
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: We just moved to the big state of Texas!
Status: offline
|
quote:
First off, a laboring woman is in no position to defend herself. I mean, I hate to break it to you, but you are overwhelmed when you are in labor, you generally (not always but generally) ARE in pain, exhausted, and unsure of things because you are NOT in control of your body. This is why I like to have a doula on hand for hospital births-so that someone can defend you-because usually husbands are too scared to defy a doctor!
I've found this to be true in my case with Hannah's labor and birth. I didn't even research induction methods/practices because that wasn't on my radar. I thought I'll go naturally or at least start off that way. The only thing I was able to stand up for myself on in Hannah's labor was my water not being broken. I kept being asked and asked again (at least 4 times) by the one doctor from my practice that I found to be horrid and unfeeling (a lady ob). I was I think between 6-8 cm when I finally relented in them breaking my water. I'm so grateful that I stuck to my guns on that or I would surely have ended in a c-section. Not because anything was wrong with Hannah...she was tolerating the induction beautifully...but because I wasn't progressing 'fast enough' and they were on the max level of pitocin allowed by law.
_____________________________
Stop vegetable genocide! Have a burger!
<-----Sweet Jael
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/11/2008 5:01:02 PM
|
|
|
Mrs.Wifey
Posts: 4447
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: The Gorgeous plains of Colorado
Status: offline
|
Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Doula's I know say that they don't run interference between the Doc and patient, they are only there to support the mother and father.
_____________________________
Ryanne Gabriella Alexis born 8-22-07!
"No firebrands, or deadly arrows just a Springfield XD .40 with Tritium sights" Patriotism
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/11/2008 5:07:36 PM
|
|
|
PrudentWife
Posts: 2149
Joined: 1/25/2006
From: The Promised Land
Status: offline
|
That is what I thought too, Ryanne. In fact, when you go into a hospital in the US, you have to specifically sign off that your husband is authorized to make medical decisions/requests on your behalf. I don't think a 3rd party can make demands unless you sign a release form empowering them to do so.
_____________________________
Don't worry that children never listen to you; worry that theyare always watching you.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/11/2008 8:51:45 PM
|
|
|
3cappuccinosmom
Posts: 2582
Joined: 4/12/2005
Status: offline
|
Joyful, thanks for posting your birth story again. I know I have really lucked out with having *really* short labors, but you really inspired me.
I would also have ended up with unneccesary c-sections if I hadn't educated myself. Even at 39 weeks, with nothing other than "possible big baby" the backup doctors for our midwives immediately went to "your only choice is induction or c-section". They really, really pushed section as "safer" and definately more convenient. I have had two really great, little/no intervention births, but I had to fight hard for them. A massively pregnant woman shouldn't have to be in that position--there's enough stress already.
_____________________________
"Children are durable and don’t necessarily wilt under adversity, just as our children don’t necessarily thrive under luxury and comfort." Garrison Keillor
Shameless Self Promotion
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/12/2008 3:18:50 PM
|
|
|
paulsbride
Posts: 2012
Joined: 5/19/2005
Status: offline
|
Ryanne - mine said the same thing, she said if Paul isn't able to be there she will say to the medical staff "remember Jessica told you ..." but she said I need to have verbalized things first, then she'll do the reminders.
_____________________________
-Jessica-
<--- 25 weeks
Pregnant with our second boy.
Due 07/07/08
Currently 32 weeks
MY BLOG
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/12/2008 3:53:48 PM
|
|
|
Royal.Fortress
Posts: 1894
Joined: 8/11/2005
From: Ontario
Status: offline
|
Joyful - how long was your labour in total, then?? It's such a beautiful story - thanks for sharing again!
_____________________________
Kim
my blog -> kim thru the looking glass
36 weeks pregnant with our June Bug!!
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/12/2008 5:38:07 PM
|
|
|
TammyIsBlessed
Posts: 1584
Status: online
|
With my first baby my water broke and nothing happened. They induced me with pitocin after about 8 hrs. How long would it be safe for me to insist they do nothing?
With my others my water leaked and nothing happened. Again I was induced. After hours of that, once my water fully broke, I went from 3 - 10 cm within an hour.
So, my question is - if I end up having to be induced again - would I be better off getting pitocin? Slowing down the pitocin to see if my body can go on on it's own? And if things slow down, asking them to break my water (with the history of my 2 previous labours?).
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/12/2008 5:48:16 PM
|
|
|
Jenny-Fair
Posts: 6064
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: WA
Status: online
|
You can go 24 hours with your waters broken, but after that you should have antibiotics if people are doing vaginal exams. If they would leave your birth canal alone, there wouldn't be much risk of infection 
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/13/2008 8:20:42 AM
|
|
|
PrudentWife
Posts: 2149
Joined: 1/25/2006
From: The Promised Land
Status: offline
|
Sideways, I kept asking to be checked too. They checked me at 8PM when I got to the hospital, and not until 10AM the next morning. I had only progressed 1cm, but I was so sure they would tell me I was at 7cm. I was only checked a couple times too and I had a long labor like you.
_____________________________
Don't worry that children never listen to you; worry that theyare always watching you.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/13/2008 5:45:27 PM
|
|
|
clag4christ
Posts: 2702
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: We just moved to the big state of Texas!
Status: offline
|
quote:
The thing my dr is concerned about with water breaking is checking for cord prolapse - which can be very dangerous. This is more of a danger when the head is not engaged of course - and with subsequent labours, the head does not usually engage until labour begins. So, that's why she's concerned about me coming in right away if my water breaks. This does make sense to me. Any thoughts? And of course, in order to check for cord prolapse they'd have to go "in there", which means the need for antibiotics and the whole clock thing kicks in.
Would a leak be better? Less chance of cord prolapse than a full break?
My water broke with Jael and I wasn't worried about cord prolapse at all. She wasn't fully engaged until later in my labor either. I personally wish that I would have labored at home longer with Jael's birth. My 'real contractions' didn't start as soon as my water broke so I could have relaxed at home at least until morning and then gone into the hospital.
Why would they have to put you on anti-biotics just because they're checking for a cord prolapse? Your 'clock' is usually 24 hours from the time of your water breaking...regardless of how many 'checks' you have.
IMO, they wouldn't actually have to even check for a cord prolapse internally if you were monitored some they could get a good estimation through the baby's heart rate.
_____________________________
Stop vegetable genocide! Have a burger!
<-----Sweet Jael
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/13/2008 6:45:27 PM
|
|
|
peculiar_lady2
Posts: 11762
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: Between Hither and Yon
Status: offline
|
quote:
The thing my dr is concerned about with water breaking is checking for cord prolapse - which can be very dangerous. This is more of a danger when the head is not engaged of course - and with subsequent labours, the head does not usually engage until labour begins.
very true...I can see how your dr would be a little antsy about that possibility. Have you had ultrasounds that look at the positioning and length of the cord to see if it would really pose a threat (as far as can be told at this time). I know with me, the more kids I have the higher the baby stays for much longer. My fourth baby didn't engage and move down into the correct position until literally minutes (like 15 or so) before he was born. So I can see how that could be a real problem.
_____________________________
Proud Army Wife
Mom to Jake, Hannah, Emma, and Jack
Baby Boy due June 25, 2008
"God has a plan for your life...and so does everybody else." ~said by Doinkdom
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/13/2008 7:36:27 PM
|
|
|
JoyfulWife
Posts: 384
Joined: 5/3/2005
From: The South
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: Royal.Fortress
Joyful - how long was your labour in total, then??
It was 50 hours in total - 48 laboring and 2 hours of pushing.
I thought that was pretty long until I recently read an article about pregnancy and belly dancing. On of the ladies interviewed was planning, and did have, a homebirth. Her labor was 91 hours long  
quote:
The thing my dr is concerned about with water breaking is checking for cord prolapse - which can be very dangerous.
That is something to worry about - but only if the baby's head is not engaged. If it's engaged, then it's most likely not going to happen. But if the baby's not engaged and your water breaks, I personally would immediately have it checked out. If the cord prolapses, it's terribly dangerous for the baby to engage after the cord is already out - the cord would be caught between the baby's head and your cervix, and there is the potential of the baby cutting off it's own oxygen supply because of the pressure from it's head engaged on top of the cord 
_____________________________
Whatever my lot, Thou hast taught me to say,
It is well, it is well, with my soul.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/13/2008 10:54:49 PM
|
|
|
TammyIsBlessed
Posts: 1584
Status: online
|
With my first my water broke and the baby was not engaged so I am a little concerned about that happening again.
That would be interesting if they could detect it at a fetal assessment - if I go overdue and need to get one done I'll definitely ask about that.
If it's just a leak do you have to worry about cord prolapse?
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/14/2008 10:21:15 AM
|
|
|
peculiar_lady2
Posts: 11762
Joined: 2/11/2007
From: Between Hither and Yon
Status: offline
|
quote:
If it's just a leak do you have to worry about cord prolapse?
I would say yes, simply because that leak could become a gush at any time...much easier for that to happen if it's already leaking. In that case of a possible gush it *could* be a huge problem for the baby.
_____________________________
Proud Army Wife
Mom to Jake, Hannah, Emma, and Jack
Baby Boy due June 25, 2008
"God has a plan for your life...and so does everybody else." ~said by Doinkdom
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/14/2008 11:22:56 AM
|
|
|
TammyIsBlessed
Posts: 1584
Status: online
|
Well then we'll just have to pray that my water doesn't break/leak and that I go into labour on my own for the first time!
_____________________________
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/14/2008 11:24:27 AM
|
|
|
paulsbride
Posts: 2012
Joined: 5/19/2005
Status: offline
|
Question: can transvaginal ultra sounds throughout the pregnancy encourage/contribute towards pre-term labor?
For some reason I always thought so, but the doctor I saw today said there is no data to prove that.
Any thoughts? Thanks.
_____________________________
-Jessica-
<--- 25 weeks
Pregnant with our second boy.
Due 07/07/08
Currently 32 weeks
MY BLOG
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/14/2008 11:35:35 AM
|
|
|
Mrs.Wifey
Posts: 4447
Joined: 4/12/2005
From: The Gorgeous plains of Colorado
Status: offline
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: paulsbride
Question: can transvaginal ultra sounds throughout the pregnancy encourage/contribute towards pre-term labor?
For some reason I always thought so, but the doctor I saw today said there is no data to prove that.
Any thoughts? Thanks.
I don't think so, otherwise I don't they would use them to check cervical length in PTL patients.
_____________________________
Ryanne Gabriella Alexis born 8-22-07!
"No firebrands, or deadly arrows just a Springfield XD .40 with Tritium sights" Patriotism
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Natural Childbirth-support and discussion - 1/14/2008 11:39:20 AM
|
|
|
PrincessDonna
Posts: 9326
Joined: 4/11/2005
From: Cow country, Upstate NY
Status: online
|
I suppose you could say that it is riskier if you looked at the research wrong. I mean...if more are done on patients at risk for pre-term labor, it could look like it can increase the risk of early labor, but that wouldn't be true.
I think in your case, it is safer to know if/when your cervix is shortening. If you know, you can be on increased bedrest, you can be given shots to speed lung development, etc. Better to know than not know, IMO.
I don't remember...when you went into labor with Judah, didn't your water break first? Had you started dilating at all yet? How long after they took the cerclage out did you have him?
_____________________________
<----We love you, Mom!!!
But I trust in your unfailing love; my heart rejoices in your salvation.
I will sing to the Lord, for he has been good to me.
~Psalm 13:5-6~
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Tools
Printable Version
