|
encore -> RE: Joseph Habedank (5/11/2007 12:50:17 PM)
|
quote:
ORIGINAL: DeeAnnBailey quote:
ORIGINAL: Seaton Joseph has not been the first artist to be critiqued on stage conduct nor will he be the last. How much criticism has Peg McKamey seen for taking her shoes off on stage (and the last few times I have seen them she has stopped doing). You can read almost on a daily basis the criticism EHSS receives for the choreographed dance steps. None of these criticisms has anything to do with a personal attack on the individuals in question. The artist is being critiqued for what they are providing the audience in the form of their stage presentation. Some will like it, some will not. I'm sure most artists can separate personal attacks from professional criticism. "Neither are any one of his hammy, manicured stage habits worth much notice in isolation – the white hanky peaking out of the clenched fist, the little glory hops at strategic moments, the over-practiced expression during particularly powerful moments of teetering between heaven and hysteria" I can see your comparison with Peg in this. "there’s the problem of Habedank’s metastasizing ego" - this however comes across more as a personal attack. For a guy whose closest friend is his thesaurus, you'd think he would know the difference between "peak" and "peek" wouldn't you? Seriously, I find his mocking lines offensive. How does he purport to know that Joseph's expressions are over-practiced? What makes him think the moves are "strategic"? Is it possibe that he doesn't recognize the emotions that sometimes accompany the things of the Spirit?
|
|
|
|